The reason why Alito’s defense of the Supreme Court’s integrity fails. The U.S. Supreme Court handed its decision on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization and then overturned Roe V. Wade, the progressive Dissenters said that the ruling “undermines the legitimacy of the Court.” On September 11, Justice Elana Kagan, one of the co-authors of the dissent, also echoed the argument.
“When courts are seen as extensions of the political process when they are seen as being extensions of the political system when they are seen as trying to dictate personal preferences onto society without regard to the law, then there’s a problem and this is when there should be a problem,” Kagan said during remarks at the Northwestern University School of Law.
The reason why Alito’s defense of the Supreme Court’s integrity fails.
Justice Samuel Alito, the creator of the Dobbs ruling Alito, the judge who wrote the Dobbs ruling, told The Wall Street Journal such criticism “crosses an important line.” This week according to The Washington Post reported the conservative jurist has continued to fight against and defend his supreme court.
The justice mentioned “Someone is also crossing an important boundary when they assert they believe that the judge is acting in manner that is not legitimate. I’m not sure that anyone who is in a post of authority should take that assertion without a lot of caution. This isn’t just a normal criticism. This is something totally different.”
He didn’t mention Kagan in any way, but in the context of the story it is quite possible that she was the one “in the position of authority” that he was referring to.
In fact In his public presentation on Tuesday Alito spoke about a variety of other significant issues, including the allegations of assassination threats, and the release in his proposed Dobbs ruling, both of which are obviously important as they are in themselves.
However, it was his constant argument in defense to his position on the Supreme Court at an institutional level that made a statement — largely since Alito’s reasoning was and remains, unpersuasive.
Going back to our previous review, a large part of the issue is the inherent confusion that Alito’s pitches present. The conservative appears to believe Kagan as well as others crossed “an essential line” although I’d be interested to know the specifics of what Alito considers to be the proper result. Do you think he believes that individuals are entitled in their disagreement with the top court, but are not able to contest its credibility?
>>> Click Here To Read More<<<
In addition, Alito hasn’t exactly presented any convincing defense of the institution in general. In reality, his argument isn’t even a convincing argument at all. To hear the justice of the extreme right say the Supreme Court’s honesty and legitimacy ought to be viewed as unquestioned because it is just that.
However, in this case the timing and place of Alito’s remarks were important also: The remarks he made on Tuesday were made public in the Heritage Foundation.
So that some of the Court’s most conservative judges believed it was an excellent idea to protect his institution’s image within an institution which has been criticized for placing partisanship above policy and going to unflattering measures to remain in the good graces of Donald Trump.
In fact, Fox News recently reported that the political arm of the Heritage company has a budget of millions to aid Republican candidates this year’s midterm elections.
The result was a bleak appearance: Alito, in the aftermath of a string of blatantly political speeches, attempted to defend Supreme Court’s legitimacy before an anti-Trump group, exactly two weeks prior to the midterm elections with early voting beginning.
Alito believes that the critics of the court are crossing “an crucial line.” In the real world, if anyone has been too far in a reckless direction is Alito.